atime Blog-atimes atimes

Charles Gasparino is well informed

March 5th, 2009
By
David Goldman

Trust me. From this morning’s New York Post:

March 5, 2009

ON Wall Street, they’re call ing the Obama economic team “the gang that
couldn’t shoot straight,” after Jimmy Breslin’s novel about a bunch of
moronic mobsters. 

If you really want to understand why the markets have been tanking, why the
smart money is sitting in cash and gold - well, just study the policy, or
lack of it, that these guys have come up with to address economic ills not
seen since the Great Depression. 

The sad thing is, the “gang” took office with high hopes on Wall Street.
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, the former New York Fed chief, was supposed
to have the experience needed to handle the banking crisis. Larry Summers,
the head of the president’s National Economic Council, was part of the
brains behind the Clinton-era recovery. 

And Paul Volcker, chairman of Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board,
helped save the free world back in the late 1970s and early ’80s as chairman
of the Federal Reserve when he squeezed inflation out of the economy and
(along with President Ronald Reagan) helped return us to prosperity. 

Wall Street loved this team. That’s why the market rallied around the time
Obama took office, even as he was promising tax hikes for “the wealthy.” But
what looks good on paper doesn’t always translate into success (sorry, Mets
fans). 

The disappointment on Geithner starts with the fact that, since taking the
job at Treasury, he’s failed to articulate a way to bail out the imploding
banking system - even though knowledge of the banking system’s ills was
supposed to be his strong suit. Worse, the word is that Geithner is still
having trouble putting together a senior staff so he can come up with a
bailout plan. 

Thanks to all the class warfare produced by his boss, I’m told, Geithner
can’t find qualified people from Wall Street (the folks who know markets
better than anyone else) to help solve the crisis. Instead, one saddened
Obama supporter from Wall Street told me, “He’s looking at a combination of
bureaucrats and academics for these jobs.” 

Larry Summers? Everyone knows he’s smart, but the word from Wall Streeters
who are trying to pass him ideas for solving the banking crisis is that his
ego’s as large as his intellect. That is, they’re finding him impossible to
deal with. 

Perhaps the biggest disappointment is Volcker, a true American hero who as
Fed chairman tamed the stagflation of the ’70s - but seems to be muzzled at
a time when the country needs him most. 

Volcker, possibly the world’s most experienced economist, is being treated
like the crazy aunt in the attic. He’s around, wandering the halls - but no
one in the administration seems to care what he thinks. 

He’s said almost nothing publicly about how to solve the current economic
crisis. Worse, people with knowledge of the Obama economic team say
Volcker’s been blunted behind the scenes - caught in the dysfunction between
Geithner and Summers. 

Here’s how one top Wall Street exec, who has tried passing along ideas to
the Obama team, put it: “Geithner thinks he’s in charge, but he has no staff
to get anything done. Summers sits there and likes to remind everyone he’s
in charge - and Volcker, probably the only adult in the room, has his nose
out of joint because no one is listening to him.” 

I know what you’re thinking: It’s too early to write these guys off - it
took the Clinton eco nomic team more than a few weeks to get its act
together. Problem is, Clinton’s guys did less damage to the economy coming
out of the gate. 

To be sure, the tax hikes of the early Clinton years slowed down the economy
- but economic czar Bob Rubin made sure they went for deficit-reduction. The
Obama budget and the so-called stimulus package don’t just expand the
deficit (as we should during a downturn), they do so in the most
irresponsible ways, with pork and programs pulled from old liberal wish
lists. 

On top of that, we get fresh threats of higher taxes on the most productive
people in the country and a bank bailout that remains a mystery. Plus policy
measures that contradict each other - like vows to unclog the banking system
of toxic mortgage debt, along with a mortgage “cram down” that would make
that debt more toxic. 

It all has Wall Street’s collective head spinning - and Obama’s most ardent
financial-industry fans deserting him. 

During the campaign, Obama won over the street even as he was bashing the
financiers who’d plunged the country into crisis through their bad bets on
risky bonds. Sources tell me Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan, Lloyd Blankfein of
Goldman Sachs, John Mack of Morgan Stanley and Dick Fuld of Lehman Bros.
(when there was a Lehman Bros.) all became supporters, as did Larry Fink,
the head of money-management powerhouse BlackRock, and senior executives at
Merrill Lynch (though then-CEO John Thain supported John McCain). 

I’ve been doing some unofficial polling of these same people in the last
couple of weeks, and the sentiment has shifted dramatically. Maybe that’s
why, as the president on Tuesday urged people to buy stocks because a bottom
was near, the market kept going down all day. 

Charles Gasparino is on-air ed itor at CNBC; his next book, “The Sellout,”
is on the financial crisis.

One Response to “Charles Gasparino is well informed”

  1. CathrynMataga Says:

    Obama has too wide an agenda. His speech mentioned the economy, but he also went on about health care, and renewable energy, and education and all this stuff. He’s probably spending all day hearing about clever ways to restructure the educational system and how the health plan is going to work, and how they can put solar panels on people’s houses — and squeezed in all this stuff, is the economy.

    This is all nice and good, but the problem is the house is on fire, and it’s burning down to the ground right now. If they don’t turn this economy around soon, none of these other plans are going to happen. At this point, I’d even settle for some Roosevelt-ian wacky ideas. At least Roosevelt was thinking about the problem and applying his own flawed understanding to what was going on. He was trying, at least.

    If his guiding principal is that government as part of the solution, maybe we’re moving to a command driven economy, and we’re adjusting to the structural flaws of that system. So rather than investing in the future, the new game becomes a matter of anticipating the whim of the leader. Does GM get bailed out or not? Well, what does Obama think? What is Bank of Ameica worth, well, what does Obama think? There’s no anticipation of the future, so everything is only worth what you can get for it right now.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.