atime Blog-atimes atimes

“Jesus Saves, Moses Invests”

January 29th, 2009
By
David Goldman

I have to agree with my old friend and Bear, Stearns colleague Larry Kudlow that the Obama stimulus plan is a monstrosity. But I don’t think that the old Reagan magic will work this time. Americans postponed a decade’s worth of saving because they thought capital gains would substitute for savings. That’s what we supply siders told them. We used to ridicule savings. In 1990 I shared a podium one Sunday morning wih then Federal Reserve Governor Wayne Angell, who had just given a sermon of sorts on the virtues of saving. Jude Wanniski, the moderator, quipped, “That concludes the Baptist portion of our Sunday morning service. Now we hear from David Goldman.” When the chuckles died away, I said, “My text for today is: Jesus saves, but Moses invests.”  I then explained that capital gains due to productivity increases made savings unnecessary. A few years later I wrote a piece for an economics journal in which I disputed that savings had much to do with human progress. How much stored-up capital did the Egyptians need to domesticate the cat, I asked? “A bowl of milk.” And how much labor? “Here, kitty-kitty.”

I repent. I’ve seen the light, or perhaps I’ve just gone over to the dark side. Whatever. America is tired and out of ideas. There’s no next new thing. Back in the Reagan years we had cell phones, CD players, PC’s, microwave ovens, video games, the Internet — a wave of innovations that made life different. Maybe somebody somebody will make money with genetic engineering and nano devices, but it’s not this year. Americans assumed that steadily rising asset prices were our birthright. Well, we were wrong.

Now we all want to save at once, which shuts down economic activity. The only way to save without shutting down the economy is to export. So, what should President Obama do?

1) Robert Mundell is right (well, that’s a layup, because he’s almost always right) that the US needs a corporate tax holiday followed by permanent corporate tax cuts. Corporate balance sheets are in better shape than household balance sheets, and corporations are more likely to use tax cuts to spending rather than to pay down debt, which is what households will do.

2) Get rid of the capital gains tax on homes — owner-occupied, speculator-purchased, whatever. Open the floodgates of speculation by restoring the ridiculous tax shelters of the early 1980s (where you could borrow money to buy real estate and make money off the deductions even if you lost money on the investment). Kick families out of their homes and let speculators move in. Forget about stopping foreclosures. Skew the tax system to create demand.

3) Stop browbeating China to raise the value of its currency, and fix the dollar-yuan parity as a solemn binational commitment. The U.S. wants the Chinese to stop saving so much and to start spending, and spending on American goods.

4) Cut employment taxes, as some prominent Republican economists have suggested. Nothing helps spur employment more than reducing its cost. That, by the way, takes the tax burden off the lowest earners, who pay payroll taxes but no income taxes.

5) Modify mark-to-market for bank portfolios. In a sharp business cycle downturn the financial system is ALWAYS insolvent on a mark-to-market basis. The issue is whether cash-on-cash returns are positive: to the banks earn enough on their portfolios to pay their bills? Let them in effect lie about how much capital they have. That would save a trillion dollars of taxpayer bailout funds (although some bailout money in the form of guarantees of debt will be required).

7 Responses to ““Jesus Saves, Moses Invests””

  1. epmccreary@aol.com Says:

    Hate to disagree, but 2) sounds like you’re advocating re-starting what we just got out of, a huge destructive housing bubble based on nearly universal speculation and 5) also sounds a bit like what we are just fleeing. After all, haven’t the banks been lying all along anyway? The collapse came because the truth came out. Somehow, a certain measure of it always seems to leak out. Somehow I suspect there’s a way to get a bit more balance of the truth and lies. After all, they depend on each other.

  2. Bob.S Says:

    David,

    I listened to an interesting interview with Edmund Phelps. He was proposing a stimulus package that had been employed in other parts of the world which had some level of success. Basically, as I understand it, instead of funding infrastructure projects which most likely could take a long time to put into motion, Phelps suggests the government provides subsides to corporations for lower income workers. This would help stem the unemployment crescendo by providing funds to prevent layoffs and would work much more quickly than an infrastructure program. I thought it was an interesting idea.

  3. kaiten Says:

    1) Chinese savers will not become spenders overnight. That´s a long way to happen, at least a generation.

    2) Tax cuts…tax cuts…tax cuts…. - and who´s gonna fill the gaps and pay off the debts? With never ending tax cuts US´s government indebtness will expolde.

  4. David Goldman Says:

    Thanks to all for comments.

    Phelps is a great economist and the idea is a good one. It does the same thing as cutting payroll taxes and then some (both ideas target lower-income employment).

    Getting speculators involved in housing doesn’t necessarily recreate a bubble, but it does bring more capital into a collapsing market. This is th fastest way to stabilize home prices, and as long as home prices are in free-fall, it’s hard for any recovery to take place.

    It’s true that the spending habits of the Chinese are hard to change, but I think that a firm dollar-yuan link would go a long way to changing things.

    Again, I’m very pessimistic about the world economy — I don’t think governments can turn a switch and get economic growth started. But these proposals are a lot better than doing nothing, and probably better than throwing a trillion dollars into public spending.

  5. rv Says:

    In this environment, do you foresee inflation down the road (say in 2009). what is the best way to protect purchasing power of dollar in this environment.

  6. Morning Skim: Obama’s Shame Game; Good Bank, Bad Bank; Supply Siders Repent - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com Says:

    [...] Times: David Goldman “repents” on his old belief that “capital gains could substitute for [...]

  7. clarketon Says:

    Yes, eliminate all taxes and the economy will take off, along with inflation.

    A better option to stop the decline in housing prices is for the Feds to devote $183 billlion and buy a million foreclosed homes directly from the banks. Then rent them out for a few years then gradually sell them. The idea is in an article at sandersresearch.com That is much better than the screwy schemes to try and redo all the loans for the people can can’t afford them anyway.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.