<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citigroup&#8217;s volatility implosion (zombies aren&#8217;t volatile)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.atimes.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932</link>
	<description>Asia Times Online weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Inner Workings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The volatility implosion, again</title>
		<link>http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Inner Workings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The volatility implosion, again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>[...] the day was the collapse of VIX to below 30% for the first time since Sept. 15. Falling volatility, I began arguing April 27, was the characteristic trade in an economy in which the Imperial Court set prices, arranged [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the day was the collapse of VIX to below 30% for the first time since Sept. 15. Falling volatility, I began arguing April 27, was the characteristic trade in an economy in which the Imperial Court set prices, arranged [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: einhorn</title>
		<link>http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932#comment-1507</link>
		<dc:creator>einhorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932#comment-1507</guid>
		<description>You ought to start emailing an investment newsletter to Inner Workings participants.

Buying low and selling high is a good idea, especially when you know what "low" and "high" is relative to the cyclothymic behavior of the market lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ought to start emailing an investment newsletter to Inner Workings participants.</p>
<p>Buying low and selling high is a good idea, especially when you know what &#8220;low&#8221; and &#8220;high&#8221; is relative to the cyclothymic behavior of the market lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: einhorn</title>
		<link>http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932#comment-1506</link>
		<dc:creator>einhorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932#comment-1506</guid>
		<description>Your comments about Zombie Banks over the last few months have been very clever.  I have a feeling that people listening to your advice lately could have made a lot of money taking advantage of the market's slow learning and odd gyrations.  How well have you done lately profiting off of animal spirits, etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comments about Zombie Banks over the last few months have been very clever.  I have a feeling that people listening to your advice lately could have made a lot of money taking advantage of the market&#8217;s slow learning and odd gyrations.  How well have you done lately profiting off of animal spirits, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DodgerUSA</title>
		<link>http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>DodgerUSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>Very upset about this -- while I sold about 2/3 of my common stock position near the top, I got a little too cute with my limit orders and stop losses and ended up not doing a thing when the market continually gapped lower to open the day.

Now I'm stuck with a position I don't really want to be in. Mr. Goldman is right that covered calls aren't exactly paying right now (I'm paraphrasing his post). I am debating whether to hold out for Q2 earnings or just take a bit smaller profit... ? I don't see another catalyst, but perhaps we can range trade up a bit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very upset about this &#8212; while I sold about 2/3 of my common stock position near the top, I got a little too cute with my limit orders and stop losses and ended up not doing a thing when the market continually gapped lower to open the day.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m stuck with a position I don&#8217;t really want to be in. Mr. Goldman is right that covered calls aren&#8217;t exactly paying right now (I&#8217;m paraphrasing his post). I am debating whether to hold out for Q2 earnings or just take a bit smaller profit&#8230; ? I don&#8217;t see another catalyst, but perhaps we can range trade up a bit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atimes.net/?p=932#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>Ah yes. This is my second month of debit spreads on C and believe me, April was much more profitable. Basically a 2 X 3 debit spread (buy 2's sell 3's) yielded 100% (and it hit the max). This month, when C was above 3 (around 3.17) I did the 2 X 3 spread (bought 2's sold 3's) and if C closes above 3 at expiration it will only yield about 30%.

Right now the 2 X 3 still looks cheap though. For example, the 2's are selling at practically zero premium (maybe a penny). The 3's, which are out of the money as of this morning are over $0.30. The spread would cost under $0.70 (maybe less than $0.65) with the potential of making about $0.35. That's more than 50% (which is better than where I got in) IF C closes above 3.

Break even would be at about $2.60 - which is better than mine, at $2.75.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes. This is my second month of debit spreads on C and believe me, April was much more profitable. Basically a 2 X 3 debit spread (buy 2&#8217;s sell 3&#8217;s) yielded 100% (and it hit the max). This month, when C was above 3 (around 3.17) I did the 2 X 3 spread (bought 2&#8217;s sold 3&#8217;s) and if C closes above 3 at expiration it will only yield about 30%.</p>
<p>Right now the 2 X 3 still looks cheap though. For example, the 2&#8217;s are selling at practically zero premium (maybe a penny). The 3&#8217;s, which are out of the money as of this morning are over $0.30. The spread would cost under $0.70 (maybe less than $0.65) with the potential of making about $0.35. That&#8217;s more than 50% (which is better than where I got in) IF C closes above 3.</p>
<p>Break even would be at about $2.60 - which is better than mine, at $2.75.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
